For the second time in a year, I was back satiating my passion for BOSTON! My goodness, by far my favourite US city!
I spent six days wandering the city as well as taking advantage of the amazing and quick commuter rail to head out to Concord to visit Orchard House (Louisa May Alcott's often homebase and the inspiration for Little Women) and to visit Walden Pond, Thoreau's homestead and Ralph Waldo Emerson's house.
I love Boston.
Some of the reasons I love it:
Boston proper is a relatively small city (especially compared to Toronto) so it is so easy to walk around in.
The Common: Reading in the Common with an iced coffee while watching those Swan boats? Love
The cobblestoned Freedom Trail.
Quincy Market and Faneuil Hall
The accents! To Canadian Rachel, most Americans have accents: but the Boston dialect is so distinctive and regionally specific----
THE NORTH END! Oh my goodness, I love the North End: site of Paul Revere's house and the Old North Church but also Boston's Little Italy---home to amazon cannoli and all manner of delicious Italian food at restaurants people line up for hours to get in.
Back Bay and Beacon Hill: the rows of red-bricked ornate architecture, the public alleys and Boulevards
THE PEOPLE: the people in Boston are so friendly. When I was there last autumn, stepping out of the airport, a woman used her Charlie Card to get me on the subway and rode past her stop to make sure I found the Back Bay station
The Green Dragon Tavern: I love the ambience and the ghosts of the rebel Sons of Liberty plotting their revolution
The Harbour: gorgeous! I mean, one moment you are remembering a ton of darjeeling was tipped over the side, the next you are gazing over at New England lighthouses
The people ( I think I mentioned this )
The Old State House and the Old South Meeting House: just walking Boston gives you a sense that you have peeled back a few hundred years
And SO MANY MORE THINGS
pictures! ( ever so craftily stolen from instagram)
I read great books in Boston
Finally finished Mad Miss Mimic by Sarah Henstra
American Eve: Evelyn Nesbit, Stanford White, the Birth of the 'It' Girl and the Crime of the Century by Paula Uruburu ( note: this non-fiction is UNPUTFRIGGINDOWNABLE )
Popular by Maya van Wagenen
The Daring Exploits of a Runaway Heiress which was adorable and snarky
I was at opening night of Newsies on its Boston tour stop and it was my first time seeing the highly anticipated Broadway show ( I have been stoked about it ). Ironically, I am seeing it opening night here in Toronto. Lots of Newsies for me!
"A plate of apples, an open fire, and a 'jolly goode booke' are a fair substitute for heaven", vowed Barney. -L.M. Montgomery, 'The Blue Castle'
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Friday, June 19, 2015
'Caroline in the City' is on youtube and I am very ranty about it......
I was amused to find all episodes of Caroline in the City on youtube. I wasn’t a diehard follower but I had seen several episodes esp of the
first season in high school and I liked the sarcastic bite of the humour mostly
between Caroline’s cartoonist Richard ( who, clad in black and obsessed with
existential poetry was a complete anomaly in 90s heroic standards) and Annie
(the best character on the show, Caroline’s best friend and a dancer in Cats).
So, when I discovered it ( probably after thinking about it
while talking to Allison) I watched a
few eps here and there on youtube, recorded from syndication on some British
station as evident through the v.o. on the credits and enjoyed revisiting the 90s
clothes, the 90s hairstyles, Lea Thompson’s dimples and the broadway
references. Note: there is a fab epwith David Hyde Pierce playing an accountant who wants to be in Cats. You
should find it.
But then, the show takes a nosedive. A nosedive.
I don’t know (and I have a barely working knowledge of this ) if it was
taking cues from relationship triangles and disasters in Friends but it goes so
way off the deep end and I GOT VERBALLY ANGRY last night.
ANGRY at a sitcom.
Why? Because I am an adult and I can.
Let’s recap the relationships in Ye Olde C in the C. You may need wine
Richard ---- morose, bitter artist turned colourist who has a
thing for sunny Caroline but doesn’t realize it til Caroline almost marries
Del---her poofy haired greeting card mogul.
Caroline doesn’t recognize this.
(note: my teenage self never realized that Richard is basically
gay. Now, it is blatantly obvious. Regardless, Richard shoulda ended up with
Annie or with Del. Whomever.).
Caroline----perky
Wisconsin native with dimples who has her own single girl in the city comic
strip. In the second season ---after a few mixed paths and almost-happens realizes
that she loves Richard. This is not done
well. This is not done subtly. Culminating in her leaving Richard a message on
his
( hello 90s!) answering machine which his returned-from-Italy old
girlfriend Julia erases.
Then Richard marries Julia!!! After pretending to be married to Caroline. This isn’t even some charming screwball comedy
move from the 30s….
Then we get season three which, I swear, I may not actually make it through:
Julia---- I HATE IT WHEN writers resort to a Julia. The Men love B**ches Trope. I HATE IT! The same guy who would fall for Caroline
would not end up marrying ( and yet he does) the woman who albeit gorgeous, he
left in Italy with his memories of backpacking.
It is awful. The two have no onscreen chemistry and the
love triangle is so very sickening.
Julia is a horrible woman and she does dastardly things and we’re
supposed to hate her but root for good girl Caroline to win Richard. But, who
WANTS Richard now that he has proven terrible decision making skills? Who wants
Richard to be the hero when he knows that he is susceptible to a gorgeous but
horrible woman with a trust fund?
Not me. Anything that
was endearing and black and artistic and nerdy about him before is now just
annoying. And Caroline is annoying
because she gives into Julia and I want them all ( except for Annie ) to fall
off a cliff.
But the show decides
(cue from Friends?) to finally get Richard and Caroline together. In the stupidest way possible. The absolute worst writing of any “love”
story ever. And they keep poking at it
with episodes soapily linked to each other in To Be Continued. It is so
genuinely awful.
First, they have the entire ensemble in an unrealistic
flashback bottle episode where they are all tied up by a marriage counselor.
Then they release Julia’s trust fund so Richard is no longer
a starving artist and can paint in a penthouse.
This is disingenuous to the character who has spent seasons ALMOST
getting his big break (in a funny and clever way). They just cash in their
bored chips and GIVE him money. All that clever writing work. UGH!
He also doesn’t have to work for Caroline anymore which means
they can’t have their daily domestic spats; nor can Annie show up from across
the hall and engage him in a battle of sardonic quips.
They paint themselves into the worst corner ever and do you
know how they get out of it? ( I am
rolling my eyes here): by having Caroline and Annie think that Julia has
cheated Richard prompting Richard to follow his wife to Spain to confront her.
Thereafter, Annie and Caroline also go to Spain and Richard almost gets
trampled BY A BULL RUN ( oh how I wish he had).
And this was the episode I watched last night after a few
pints with a friend and I WAS SO LIVID that someone ( a many someones, to be
exact) made actual real live money and lots of it for writing this awful
nonsense. Like give me the money and
make Richard get trampled by the bulls….
And it gets even worse…
Caroline and Annie
have apologized for their mistake and gone back to New York. Richard follows Caroline because on his
deathbed from bull trample ( he’s not even scraped) he re-evaluated his life
and wanted to be with Caroline.
You two shouldn't be together. The cat deserves more happiness |
And I didn’t get past this moment so I cannot tell you what
happens next because I was yelling at my computer and because I love my MacBook
Air so much didn’t want to be inspired
to throw it across my room in frustration.
So what have we learned?
A.) people who write throaway bull running episodes owe me money B.) I
hate it when writers create a “love triangle” by having their heroine or hero
end up with a jerky mean and evil person. WHY WILL WE LIKE THEM IF THEY MAKE
POOR LIFE CHOICES AND FALL FOR HORRIBLE people?
C.) the 90s. oh the 90s
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
book gush! Tiffany Girl by Deeanne Gist
Rambly Rambly Book Gush
I am going to go straight out and say that Deeanne Gist
hasn’t always been a favourite read of mine. Not her writing ability, so much as her heroines and the conventional wrap-up and message of her stories. But,I read them all. I guess because I saw some spark I
knew might be one day fully realized.
I followed her from her Bethany House days to Howard and found that I enjoyed the Fair
books more than I had her previous books. We are, thought I, on the right
track. Maybe because she had moved away from ( there's nothing wrong with this ) a more conservative inspirational publisher and had a little more wiggle room.
Then, Tiffany Girl came along. And this is the
book that, I think, Gist was meant to write and it makes the statements I wish
she had made throughout her entire fictional career. You see, Gist’s
previous romances hedged on the happy ending. As was part and parcel of
the demographic she was writing for and the convention she was writing in (
again, nothing wrong with this) but both present an odd paradox for a
romantically inclined feminist. I often find myself at a bit of a
complicated odds in my reading life: for while I love romance, I am a bit of a
complex contradiction, sad often that the heroine’s life really STARTS when she
weds and the independence and spirit that saw her to that eventuality sometimes
gets tucked under a carpet of domesticity. Of course---and slightly tangential
here---we have series like Thoene’s Zion Covenant where Elisa and Murphy are
just as exciting to watch after marriage as before. Raybourn's City of Jasmine is another example of this trope working
well. The same with the Scarlet
Pimpernel, where the marriage off-sets a romance more dazzling than before.
But, for the most part, the happily ever after sealed the
deal with Gist’s heroines and I found myself thinking a bit of them had
died. The prose and story waltzed around the eventuality of marriage.
Rightly so, as this was the focal point of so many women’s stories in
historical periods. But, I digress....
Here, Gist decides to invert the trope that she so long fictionally subscribed to and, in what I find a brilliant tongue-in-cheek colouring outside
the lines ( brilliantly paired, here, with the artistry motif) she writes a
treatise on the very thing that made her career: the romance ending in
marriage.
Flossie is not your ordinary girl. Instead, she is
believably complex. Like so many women she is torn between her desire for her
husband and children as well as her passion for her art. When she is
offered the chance to be a Tiffany Girl: to work the stained glass for the grand
exhibit at the Chicago World’s Fair, she grabs it at the reins. (Note: this is brilliant
because while so much fiction in the CBA market focuses on the actual fair,
this is in the periphery ---art meant to be displayed there that gives us a
bustling New York backdrop). Despite the reservations of her
parents, who have supported her interest in art and her artistic schooling to
this point in hopes she would give it up for a husband and babies, she moves
out to become a New Woman and takes up residence in a boarding house.
For the first half or so of the novel what we see realized
is one of my favourite types of story: an almost bildungsroman of a woman
trying to fit into a mould that she is not meant for. Flossie is certain
that her intrinsic ideals are well-matched with the New Woman archetype and yet
she is not a character who can be fit into a type. She immediately falls back
on cordial hospitality: befriending the boarders and setting up little dinner
parties and games.
Reeve Wilder ( note: by far Gist’s best hero and one of my
favs of the year) is not under Flossie’s spell. He thinks New Women are
like to undermine and overhaul all that is sacred about motherhood, home life
and family. His dark and lonely past help realistically inform his
distrust of this new model of women and he speaks out quite plainly against
Flossie. Yet, they are neighbours, and while he cannot advocate for her
lifestyle, he is intrigued by the light that surrounds her, her artistic
sensibility and the warmth that imbues every single person in the boarding
house.
There are charming scenes where Flossie pricks away at
Reeve’s icy exterior just as there are scenes involving Reeve and an elderly
widow --- where we get to see the true treasure behind the New Woman rant and
spiels.
Both characters are --as I feel so often as a reader/ woman ---contradictions. Brilliant, befuddling contradictions as so many of us! Real, fleshy human beings with hopes and flaws. Do they grow?
Absolutely.
When Reeve begins writing a fictionalized serial about a New
Woman, modeled on Flossie, of course, the book's ideologies slowly start to
shift and its stern yet subtly woven statement begins to emerge.
Everyone wants a happy ending for the fictional heroine. And
a happy ending for fictional serialized girl means giving up her photography business ( for what married
woman can work!) and falling into marital bliss. The editor basically
tells Reeve he has set the story up for this moment. This trapping is the only
seeming resolution for two characters of 1890s New York. Of
course, the readers expect the same. But something has changed. Reeve has
begun to understand why women want to make their own money, why women want to
pursue their passions and leave their indelible marks outside of the
expectations and industry of men. Reeve has begun to see why
Flossie wants what she wants.
The desire is not to overthrow him, the desire is for her to
be herself—have her own passion and dreams.
In ingenious parallel, meta-fictional and fictional worlds
collide and intertwine.
There is some confusion, some dancing, some spats, some cute
moments and a few kisses ( much hotter, with innuendo-ed language that far
outweighs any further descriptive) and the metaphor of doors being open and
closed.
There are ups and downs as Flossie learns that her passion
for her art and her natural skills are at odds with each other. She recognizes
that she is average. Quite remarkable for a woman in a historical fiction
novel, where we pride ourselves on women who break boundaries and excel. She does
these things, yes, but on a small scale.
And Reeve....well Reeve.... learns what it is to let his guard
down. And he writes some more and she finds herself in his words – and
not in words crafted around her caricature, where her flaws and contradictions
are paraded, but in soft, dulcet tones.
And romance ensues.
Real, toe-tingly romance.
And we whirl and twirl and Blue Danube our way into a
pattern that is so familiar and that is exhumed so expertly into marital and
domestic certainty…..and yet….
Yet....
This book may have lost me if it had not been able to
maintain its equilibrium between the two characters. This book is
romantic feminism at its best when it works with the often explored theme of
shared marital finances.
Reeve and Flossie are not of a time period where they can
shake the world to such extent it turns on its ear. Reeve and Flossie are
not of a time where women can work and still be married. But, Gist is
brilliant enough to assuage convention by carefully threading what true
independence and collaboration mean. And, for her, and for her
characters, this is deftly interwoven in terms of money, earnings and how
married couples divide property. There are limitations, but
these are not the days of pin money and rescinded property.
So she makes her statement and it is better still because it
is historically plausible. We know that Reeve and Flossie are part
of a chugging motion that will echo into the future and bring us to the point
where we are at today: a point where women with independent passions and means
outside of familial life are advocated for as much as those who choose marriage
and families.
I suppose ( and I thought of this continually while writing)
, part of the reason I always read Gist’s books is because the historical
accuracy and research is resplendent. From basketball to trolley assaults, she
outdoes herself here.
I also want to make note of the inspirational content.
Gist was indeed an inspirational author. This is very much a general
market book. There is nothing christian about this story. Save in its subtle
themes ( i.e., Reeve pays Flossie’s debt at one point, anonymously and without
wanting payment). However, she keeps all *ahem* action
behind closed doors. That doesn’t detract from the sexual tension,
though. It is palpable. (okay, so there’s this hot scene where
Flossie arrives in the middle of the night chilled to the bone from wandering
in a blizzard and boarding house mate Reeve has waited up for her and he rubs
her feet so they don’t get frostbite. And this is, like, the sexiest thing
since Willoughby helped Marianne Dashwood with a sprained ankle or since Dick
Dewy and Fancy Day washed their hands together in Under the Greenwood Tree)
QUOTES!
"Instead, he found her mouth again and wrapped his arms clear around her. "Open your mouth, magpie."
"What?"
He kissed her, really kissed her. She made mewling sounds. She raked her fingers through his hair. She twisted against him. Bracketing his ears, she pushed his mouth away. "I thought I was going to die during the photos!"
"That's the whole point of being a New Woman. They don't want to be reduced to housewifery. They feel it would take away everything that is special about them."
"Well, now she really was a New Woman and also in love. Neither looked even remotely like her fantasies."
Monday, June 15, 2015
Happy Book Birthday: The Sound of Diamonds
I love featuring debut novelists and Rachelle Rea's passion for excavating the Reformation period in a genre and market that often fails to delve into this part of history is very exciting indeed.
From the publisher:
Her only chance of getting home is trusting the man she hates.
With the protestant Elizabeth on the throne of England and her family in shambles, Catholic maiden Gwyneth seeks refuge in the Low Countries of Holland, hoping to soothe her aching soul. But when the Iconoclastic Fury descends and bloodshed overtakes her haven, she has no choice but to trust the rogue who arrives, promising to see her safely home to her uncle's castle. She doesn't dare to trust him...and yet doesn't dare to refuse her one chance to preserve her own life and those of the nuns she rescues from the burning convent.
Dirk Godfrey is determined to restore his honor at whatever cost. Running from a tortured past, Dirk knows he has only one chance at redemption, and it lies with the lovely Gwyneth, who hates him for the crimes she thinks he committed. He must see her to safety, prove to the world that he is innocent, prove that her poor eyesight is not the only thing that has blinded her but what is he to do when those goals clash?
The home Gwyneth knew is not what she once thought. When a dark secret and a twisted plot for power collide in a castle masquerading as a haven, the saint and the sinner must either dare to hold to hope...or be overcome.
(pick up a copy at Amazon)
Rea captures the gritty depth and dark religious fervour shading the Reformation period. She sprinkles her prose with an imaginative tint and ensures that she infuses her words with the right amount of romance and intrigue.
Her spirit and passion for grammar and the written word are evident ten-fold in the parts of Sound of Diamonds I have had the privilege to read thus far.
Rachelle wrote her first historical romance novel the summer after her sophomore year of college. Two years later, only a few short months after graduation, she signed a three-book deal to release that novel--and its sequels. Times gone by snatch Rachelle close. So she reads and writes about years long ago.
Monday, June 08, 2015
Signed Sealed Delivered: from Paris with Love
Oh guys, if you want the television equivalent of gooey mac and cheese then that is what SSD is for.
When you want to believe that the world is a lovely place full of lovely people with lots of integrity who wear their hearts on their sleeves---- then that is also what SSD is for.
It is full of the most delightful quirky characters: all relics of a time past who are trying to fit into a changing world. They are endearing and loveable for their obvious eccentricities.
The POstables have returned. Shane and Oliver ( he is, as you know, my ideal man ) and Rita and Norman.
This time their dead letter office mystery involves divorce papers that never arrived for a marriage on the brink of a terrible mistake. As is the usual, the dead letter mystery parallels a major life event for one of the POstables: this time Oliver and is horribly annoying wife Holly who left him at the Post Museum ( how could she. I will never forgive her. You suck, Holly. DID YOU SEE WHAT AN AMAZING GUY YOU HAD!!! stupid Holly).
Anyways, Holly is back and Shane is pining. Rita is swept away as Miss Special Delivery and Norman thinks he has competition to his owl-loving gal.
It's all so sweet I wanna wrap it up and put a bow on it.
SSD believes in love. And in marriage. And in tradition.
It is a throw back ---as Oliver O'Toole is--- to a time of words and chivalry. To a time when society wasn't tripping over itself to move faster.
It is just delectable. A delectable ode to the written word. Here, we have a new motif constructed in Holly's new penchant for poetry. Her poems and Oliver's reaction to them are one of the highlights of a well-crafted hour and a half.
Previously, Signed, Sealed, Delivered was a series with hour-long episodes featuring a small post office mystery. Hallmark, since, has opted to explore a different format with several little self-contained films a year.
This works for me. Anything works for me! ....As long as I get to hang out with my lovely POstables.
For those of you who enjoy Shane and Oliver, you will get some darling moments. For those of you who also enjoy Rita and Norman, your heart will end up in your throat. OH MY GOODNESS!
With thanks to our friends at Grace Hill Media for allowing this Canadian to watch a media screener of the new film.
When you want to believe that the world is a lovely place full of lovely people with lots of integrity who wear their hearts on their sleeves---- then that is also what SSD is for.
It is full of the most delightful quirky characters: all relics of a time past who are trying to fit into a changing world. They are endearing and loveable for their obvious eccentricities.
The POstables have returned. Shane and Oliver ( he is, as you know, my ideal man ) and Rita and Norman.
This time their dead letter office mystery involves divorce papers that never arrived for a marriage on the brink of a terrible mistake. As is the usual, the dead letter mystery parallels a major life event for one of the POstables: this time Oliver and is horribly annoying wife Holly who left him at the Post Museum ( how could she. I will never forgive her. You suck, Holly. DID YOU SEE WHAT AN AMAZING GUY YOU HAD!!! stupid Holly).
Anyways, Holly is back and Shane is pining. Rita is swept away as Miss Special Delivery and Norman thinks he has competition to his owl-loving gal.
It's all so sweet I wanna wrap it up and put a bow on it.
SSD believes in love. And in marriage. And in tradition.
c/o Hallmark Movies and Mysteries |
It is just delectable. A delectable ode to the written word. Here, we have a new motif constructed in Holly's new penchant for poetry. Her poems and Oliver's reaction to them are one of the highlights of a well-crafted hour and a half.
Previously, Signed, Sealed, Delivered was a series with hour-long episodes featuring a small post office mystery. Hallmark, since, has opted to explore a different format with several little self-contained films a year.
This works for me. Anything works for me! ....As long as I get to hang out with my lovely POstables.
Marry me, Oliver. Marry me now! |
For those of you who enjoy Shane and Oliver, you will get some darling moments. For those of you who also enjoy Rita and Norman, your heart will end up in your throat. OH MY GOODNESS!
With thanks to our friends at Grace Hill Media for allowing this Canadian to watch a media screener of the new film.
Thursday, June 04, 2015
Theatre Review: 'Titanic'
Here’s the deal: if Kat likes something then you know it has
something going for it.
Ever since I’ve known her, Kat has loved the musical
Titanic. So I knew when it came to
Toronto that a.) we had to go that b.) it would have something amazing going
for it.
Kat is one of the most intelligent people I have ever met. So, she has no time for dumb stuff.
Before I go further, let us make a few things clear a.)
Titanic: the Musical is not as terrible as Titanic: the Musical sounds like it
could be b.) it is a predecessor of the crappy James Cameron film. It has
nothing to do with the film other than the fact that they are set on the same
boat.
So I went in with the expectation that Kat likes it so it
will have something going for it.
It had a ton going for it including one of the best Broadway
scores I have heard in my lifetime.
Maury Yeston (Nine, Grand Hotel ) doesn’t just jukebox the heck outta
some nonsense content. He goes deep, he goes big and there is not a note of
anachronism in his rendering of whatever musical period he is invested in.
For Titanic, a welcome marriage of Celtic influence,
Edwardian popular pomp (think Sousa) and mournful melody ( think Vaughan
Williams) as well as a reverent hymn and ragtime and
dance hall: music of the period is knit together in a smorgasbord of perfectly
suited style.
It's going to hades, Mr. Andrews, but you get a darned good song outta it |
The music is so clever (the lyrics, too, but more on
that in a moment ) that even its “happiest” melodies have a portentous
note. It is rapturous to listen to how
intelligent this all is. And when you
add the lyrics and the marvelous way he knits the quilt of the story (Stoker
and Telegraph operator have a duet, the
classes are distinguished with a triad of couples--a third class Irish lass and her
fellow, a social climbing American wannabe, Isador Strauss of Macy’s fame and
his wife), as well as the captain, the builder and the owner create a
sequence of musical vignettes. All, of
course, are tied together in the metaphor of a floating city or world. The metaphor of Titanic as a representation of civilization is a recurring motif and embroidered throughout with references not only to class structure but to men speeding ahead of its time. For one, it notes the pyramids( as an example of many).
To add, musical tropes made slightly minor recur. At one moment a theme promenades the grand and opulent launch of a great ship, when the theme is revisited it evokes the frantic and harried frenzy of passengers spilling into the lifeboats.
And it goes even deeper.
Every lyric preludes what will happen.
For me, the most surprising and interestingly innovative duet is between
Barrett, the Stoker, and Bride, the telegraph operator. While Bride plunks out a message to Barrett’s
love behind he sings of the loneliness made moot by Marconi’s world-bridging
apparatus. The self same apparatus that will at once isolate and colonize the
entire ship with hope and despair. A
lifeline when the Californian is near, a death-knell as it pats out the last
SOS signal. And yet this isolation
juxtaposed with Barrett’s singing the imagery of heaven’s blanket foreshadows a
starless, still night and the prayers of thousands facing the glass- shattered
pricks of their icy deaths.
Another astonishing musical decision of Yeston’s was to
forego the music history informs us was played on the voyage with his own
similar composition. The meters of his
own hymn certainly reflect the hymns that would have been sung aboard ship
while his version of the Autumn waltz( largely believed to be the last tune the
band played as the ship sank ) has the same interesting measure and sequence as
the original.
The musical is the best version of historical fiction: it
creates its own world, populates it with actual personages and makes them more
representation than individual character.
The characters here represent themes. Yeston doesn’t try to develop
them---nor should he. They are already set in stone. Moreover, he rotates the
carousel of the world so that stage and song-time is distributed in so many
directions, it would do a disservice to funnel on one “lead” character.
This is a chorus piece. This is an ensemble dream.
The musical certainly captures the essence of the period and
the event ( as mentioned, most pronouncedly in its musical setting) but from a
deftly altered way.
The staging of the tour (late of Britain and now over in North
America to make its rounds) is sparse.
You will use your imagination but the story, song sequences and sound
make you feel as if your modern era has been peeled away.
There is a cacophony of eerie sounds and joyful robust
resolutions. There is a layer of hope and dismal despair at once. The score,
here, is a veritable feast. I cannot remember the last time I was this
impressed by a Broadway score and surprised it took near 20 years from its
debut for me to get my teeth into it.
It’s clever storytelling surrounded by majestic and
magnificent music and, as it has nothing to do with effing James Cameron’s
stupid film, you can go in satisfied and leave, as I did, with expectations
exceeded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)