A romantic friend of mine recently got married. She’s a
kindred spirit in the truest sense of the word. One of those girls, like most
of us, who set up our castles on fluffy clouds and dream, with high standards,
of the man we will eventually marry. She, like me… like so many of us, had it
all worked out in her head in perfect connect-the-dots fashion since childhood.
The man she married: who swept her off her feet and whom she
is ridiculously happy with--- was not that ideal. At all. Rather, he was far more perfect for her than her imaginative trajectory could have foreseen.
Whenever I talk about ideals, the constructs that shape we
imaginative sorts from the rest of normal humanity, I note that I am usually speaking
to women who, like me, were very much shaped by the tales of LM
Montgomery. There is nothing LM
Montgomery does if not instill in one an absolute early-founded penchant for
romance. It’s unlike any other
romance you will read about or
experience in your head, her romance. It
does wonders for your psyche and your imaginative constructs: mostly because
these yarns are read in the formative years where it is absolutely essential
for you to identify with her spirited heroines.
The women I know who don’t share a passion for Montgomery
somehow evaded her in childhood: when the purple prose, the wistful, whimsical
lanes that spun to coloured, christened
homesteads, the long glances and the high-spirited “high faluting mumbo jumbo”
( to quote Kevin Sullivan’s Gilbert Blythe) were rampant in our playful
imaginations.
oh HIIIIII morgan!!! nice coat-tails |
While I wouldn’t trade my long and quite intense
relationship with Montgomery…. I admit that my inability to find the same
romance and happiness a lot of girls my age have found in real life has
something to do with her helping me establish standards. Not just for men: not just for her heroes and
their inherent qualities [or exterior qualities---Barney Snaith’s dimples, for
one, Andrew Stuart’s manner of speech, for another]; but mostly for the
relationship that the heroes in her novels share with their heroines. The preternatural kinship that strings two
souls together. It’s quite wonderful to
read and re-read and read again the banter between Dean Priest, say ( not
condoning him as a perfect hero; but recognizing how attractive he can be when
he is at his whimsical and gnome-like best) , when he is at his best with Emily
or the playful way that Valancy and Barney can read each other’s thoughts
without anything being spoken.
The other night, after a text conversation with the friend
listed above, I confronted this age-old idea of ideals. I fall for them all the time. I create and construct
them into something far beyond myself. I
am guilty of it as many of my ilk are. I
settled in with the Sequel to Anne of Green Gables as imagined by Sullivan.
Part of my appreciation for the Sullivan adaptation comes in
the composite sketch of Morgan Harris who groups together different characters
from the Anne series to create a dashing hero straight from Anne’s imagination
and erstwhile conversations with Diana.
She has already explained to Gilbert and Diana what her ideal man is and
she is fairly certain she won’t find him in Avonlea. When she first encounters Morgan, she is
writing on the banks of the breezy North Shore near the White Sands hotel. Her pages flutter away as she loses herself
in the language of “dark foreboding tones” and similar vernacular of her Purple
Prose and it is Morgan, looking straight as if she were Pygmalion and he was
constructed in physical form, who assists her.
Her second encounter with Morgan, after the Clam Bake is
somewhat more typically Anne. At this
point she has confronted Gilbert for his silly school boy ways and has had to
inform him that she will never feel the way about him the way he does her. Morgan is rambling on the dark road and runs
into Anne’s carriage. It is here that he is first treated with typical
temperamental Anne aplomb. He tries to
be a gentleman, drips a few sarcastic lines that put one in mind of Andrew
Stuart or Barney Snaith, raises a dashing eyebrow and spirits off.
She encounters Morgan again ---and for a far longer period
of time – when she accepts the position at Kingsport Ladies College in New
Brunswick and tutors his daughter. Anne
is taken with Morgan because he is like one of the heroes from Averil’s
Atonement come to life (sans Rolling Reliable Baking Powder ).
When I express my love for Morgan ( noting that he is very
much my ideal: an older man with experience, a dark past, a penchant for
adventure---he’s a ship’s captain for God’s sake--- and a love of culture ) I
am often derided by those who are passionate Gilbert fans. What they might momentarily fail to remember
through the veil of loving All Things Gil is that Morgan was very much Anne’s
perfect man, too.
Indeed, I think, and this is speaking to Sullivan’s
conception of course, that the Anne of that series might definitely have accepted
Morgan’s offer of marriage had she not run into Gilbert in town on a weekend
for a medical conference. It is seeing
him again that prompts her to take up her writing about home and experience
another spell of homesickness. She drops the “high faluting mumbo jumbo” of her
romance stories and, subsequently, is able to turn her back on the
pitch-perfect romantic life offered her by her supposed ideal. Seeing an island boy and connecting him with
a sprint of creativity with a nostalgic turn towards Green Gables and days of
old severs any chance that Morgan Harris had of winning Anne’s love.
He’s not a dark or sinister hero, he doesn’t hurt her or
impose negativity on her; in fact he might be the most important person who
comes into her life. It is only when she is confronted with her ideal that she
recognizes that it will never bring her happiness. There is a flesh and blood incarnation of
Anne’s lofty man who will read her “Tennyson
by firelight”; but upon his materialization, she is driven home and
subsequently to Gilbert.
As much as Montgomery champions lofty ideals and purple
prose and romance in all of its fleeting and fluttering forms; so does she inspire
thoughtful recognition that the best romances are often found outside of the
lines we sketch and trace for ourselves.
In this way, I am put in mind of the ultimate Montgomery
dreamer, Valancy Stirling. The Blue
Castle is my favourite Montgomery romance because it is this very idea made
manifest. The very title speaks to
Valancy’s eponymous ideal situation: a castle not unlike the Alhambra in Spain
with turrets and nooks where heroes wait on her every whim and desire. The heroes in the Blue Castle, we learn,
change as Valancy gets older. At the beginning, on the morning of her 29th
birthday, her hero looks very much like a man she has recently seen around
Deerwood: the notorious Barney Snaith.
When circumstances inspire Valancy to propose marriage to Barney, she is
made more acutely aware that her initial ideal has melded into something that
this man and his life circumstance have provided. Her Blue Castle is now a
Muskoka cottage, her ideal prince is now Barney. On the morning of her hasty wedding , she
thinks back to her childhood conception of marriage, of the day of her wedding:
of what her dress might be, the cake, what the groom would say and how he would
stand. Instead, she has realized that
her perfect happiness transcends the daydreams that so occupied her when she
was relegated to a lifeless existence on Elm Street. Just as the fateful night after she first
sees Barney scrambling up from underneath his car melds the previous prince of
the Blue Castle into a roguish like creature with dimples and “the look of an
amused gnome”, so does Tom MacMurray’s cabin on Barney’s island become more
castle than she could ever want. So does this man with a supposed reprobate
past and a somewhat unconventional attractiveness become more than she ever
wanted.
Montgomery’s heroines teach us to dream, to construct
ideals, to build our castles in the sky; but when they are confronted with
their happy ending and their perfect pairings it is often beyond their wildest
dreams. My recently married friend said that she never dreamt it would feel the
way it does. I guess this is what happens when you find your perfect
match. I guess it transcends these ideas
and our wildest imaginations. It isn’t perfect or cookie-cutter, it is more the
tingling surprise that Valancy experiences when Barney’s car breaks down in the
backwoods of Muskoka after a roaring party at Chidley Corners. There, in the
barrens of nowhere, with Barney sitting silently beside her, any ideal that
took her far from small Ontario and to the greatest spanses of the world with
the most deliciously enigmatic hero could never replace the perfect happiness
she feels sitting next to that which makes her whole.
To summarize, I think that Montgomery woman should hold out
for ideal because it will occur in whatever shape or way it is meant to. It will more greatly surprise and bewilder
and delight if confronted with a life of refusing to settle for anything less than
pure happiness.
4 comments:
Love it, Rachel! It's so true, Montgomery's romances are so different from anyone else's romances, especially when they catch you at an impressionable age. :-) And they're inspiring precisely because they're more down to earth than the perfect romantic ideal.
Good job!
Excellent! Very well-said my friend!!
i think a lot of it has to do with what you say, gina: catching the right reader at the right time. i was certainly impressionable when montgomery found me and she stuck :)
I'm currently watching Anne of Avonlea and was sucked into L.M Montgomery's writing at a young age. And much as I hold a candle to Gil and Teddy respectively, there's just something about Dean Priest and the televersion of Morgan Harris that appeals. Thanks for writing this lovely and poignant article. :)
Post a Comment