It’s been awhile since Great Adaptations last showed up on
le blog. However, that was because even
though I watched the 2011 BBC version at Christmas, I wanted to ensure that all
North American friends had the chance to view it on Masterpiece Theatre. Since my DVD arrived last week, I have spent
many an hour carefully perusing it and experiencing each minute detail which
has more sternly formulated my opinion that it is the best film adaptation to
date. That’s not to say that it isn’t without flaws or that it doesn’t distance
itself from the text; but its choices make a lot of sense and it “feels” like
Great Expectations: from the murky marshes to the clouded, cloistered
cobblestones of Pip’s London, through the satined lace of young women lined
like a garland at a party as Pip takes Estella’s ivory hand to the decrepitly
ravished wedding feast of the irreplaceable Miss Havisham.
The characterization is deft and taut and each of these
well-known personages, who could easily become caricatures so inferenced are
they in our cultural psyche, are instead the embodiment of pathos and light, of
humour and heartbreak: of proof that, above all, Great Expectations is a
narrative borne of extraordinary acts of unwarranted kindness.
It is no surprise that I am completely befuddled and
bewildered by the continual influence this particular tale has on me: how it
exposes my vulnerability, my strengths, and the darker tenets of human
expectation: the trajectory, and further tragedy, begotten of our wanting
something more…. But this particular series drew from creaked corner into
luminous light the characters I have often felt between the pages of my
well-worn novel. During the Bicentenary
Celebrations earlier this year, one statistic ( which I cannot cite,
unfortunately) listed both Miss Havisham and Joe Gargery as two of the 10 best-known
Dickensian characters. Great
Expectations---whether having been forced on readers in high school---or having
been re-visited with stylistic enterprise in the 90s or whether (fortunately)
given weight in two current adaptations
( this miniseries and the upcoming Hollywood) film or even as a funky premise
for a South Park episode--- is an inescapable portion of the Western
canon. Perhaps because we can see so
much of ourselves in Pip, we can see so much of what we would like to be in the
actions of Joe and Herbert and Magwitch, we enjoy the Soap Operatic twists and
turns linking Estella, her bat-crazy adoptive mother and the sinister Jaggers
and his erstwhile maid Molly---- it’s human relations: sex, power, money, loss
of money, disillusionment, odd reconciliation at its best.
There’s crime, almost murder, escaped convicts, boat chases, whirls of balls and abusive
husbands…. Who wouldn’t want this?
As ultimately complex as the tale is and as many characters
as it introduces ( some completely left out of this particular imagining: most
noticeably Biddy) it is, at its core, a sleek bildungsroman pitting a young and
good-hearted orphan against the sudden Cinderella-like fate that follows him to
his apprenticeship years as a blacksmith in the Kent Marshes.
This adaptation has received numerous BAFTA nominations for its
craft and presentation and it is quite easy to see why: it is a tangible and delectable world that
you can smell and see and touch: it is gritty and horrible, it is crusted with
the mould of Satis House and encrypted in the smoke billowing from the forge and
as Pip sheds his cocoon to dress in the gentleman’s clothes that propel him out
into society with his lovely pal Herbert, we see the finest threads carefully
woven to speak their intricate tailorship: a perfect recognition of the period
and the Era’s finery.
It also includes some of my favourite performances of some
of the best-loved Dickensian characters.
For my part, I feel that this
adaptation’s Herbert Pocket, Magwitch, Joe Gargery, Pip and Miss Havisham are
the best I have seen.
I encourage you to spend some time in this world. I have
revisited it quite a bit. This past
week, I was traveling for work and ended up steeping some tea in my hotel room
and catching it again on iTunes:
obsessed? Perhaps a little; but more enamored and bewitched that a dazzling
presentation has wrought from my mind’s eye to camera’s lens a kaleidoscopic
Victorian world I crave to seep into time and again.
1 comment:
I'm really glad to find someone else who so enjoyed it -- some do not like it, and I find that a horrific shame. It's wonderful, and my favorite adaptation of the book yet. But then, maybe I am biased, since I think Gillian Anderson is an absolutely terrific Miss Havisham.
Post a Comment