tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26185264.post3158933387101969847..comments2024-02-23T01:35:47.264-08:00Comments on a Fair Substitute for Heaven: Where Rachel McMillan hangs out : In Which I Go Comic Book (It's like that Brian McKnight song---but worse)Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04256326961775297121noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26185264.post-44936399756341809672011-06-08T18:15:26.605-07:002011-06-08T18:15:26.605-07:00well written, R!well written, R!blakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26185264.post-59740987749685852852011-06-08T10:56:19.169-07:002011-06-08T10:56:19.169-07:00I posted my rebuttal here. It actually doesn't...I posted my rebuttal <a href="http://books.moonsoar.com/archives/2011/06/08/on-dc-going-back-to-1/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. It actually doesn't bother me that they're going back to the beginning at all.Courthttp://books.moonsoar.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26185264.post-4983421711302912282011-06-08T10:32:37.379-07:002011-06-08T10:32:37.379-07:00Well.
I generally tend to DISLIKE reboots to fra...Well. <br /><br />I generally tend to DISLIKE reboots to franchises, for a variety of reasons (of which you've mentioned) and can only think of one which I actually "like", but with a disclaimer - the JJ Abrams Star Trek. I have to rationalize my intense "like" of this film by asserting that it involves a new parallel universe, as opposed to obliterating the current canon. Therefore, both stories can exist at the same time. <br /><br />When franchises are rebooted, I can only HOPE that it's really just a parallel universe, because to take an established canon that spans years (decades in some cases) and suddenly render it null and void is a disservice to the fandoms.ducKy Boydhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13073089300933708375noreply@blogger.com